RSM logo
JRSM

Home Current issue Browse archive Alerts About the journal Feedback
 
J R Soc Med 2006;99:14-19
doi:10.1258/jrsm.99.1.14
© 2006 Royal Society of Medicine

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Send a Quick Comment
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when Quick Comments are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shaw, S.
Right arrow Articles by Barrett, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
J R Soc Med 2006;99:14-19
© 2006 The Royal Society of Medicine

Series

Research governance: regulating risk and reducing harm?

Sara Shaw1   Geraldine Barrett2

1 Senior Research Fellow, Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, University College London, Holborn Union Building, Highgate Hill, London N19 5LW;
2 Lecturer, School of Health Sciences and Social Care, Brunel University, Osterley Campus, Borough Road, Middlesex TW7 5DU, UK

E-mail: s.shaw{at}pcps.ucl.ac.uk

SUMMARY

Risk assessment can be thought of as the lens through which we anticipate the consequences of research and the impact of the actions of researchers. The way in which risk of harm is managed in research is strongly influenced by the surrounding social and political environment, leading to differences in national and local styles of regulation and review.

Different research studies carry different risks, so systems for review and approval must adapt to the question being asked and the nature of the study. Researchers can never wholly guarantee safety in any research but participants and researchers must be offered reasonable protection within any study, with appropriate arrangements in place should something go wrong.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Health Serv Res PolicyHome page
L. Brown, M. Parker, and M. Dixon-Woods
Whose interest? British newspaper reporting of use of medical records for research
J Health Serv Res Policy, July 1, 2008; 13(3): 140 - 145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JRSMHome page
T. Kielmann, A. Tierney, R. Porteous, G. Huby, A. Sheikh, and H. Pinnock
The Department of Health's research governance framework remains an impediment to multi-centre studies: findings from a national descriptive study
J R Soc Med, May 1, 2007; 100(5): 234 - 238.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JRSMHome page
R. A.-S. Salman, T. M Brock, M. S Dennis, P. A G Sandercock, P. M White, and C. Warlow
Research governance impediments to clinical trials: a retrospective survey
J R Soc Med, February 1, 2007; 100(2): 101 - 104.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]